Today the first of our patients, Dr Dianne Ashworth (/u/diashworth), is here to answer your questions. You can find out more about her here (or just do an internet search for her name):

Joining Dianne are researchers from Bionic Vision Australia. Each of these respondents represents a specific team within the wider project, but all have experience with multiple aspects of the project:

  • /u/xeiss Dr David Nayagam (Bionics Institute; BI | Device Development & Preclinical Team)
  • /u/JYeoh Dr Jonathan Yeoh (Centre for Eye Research Australia; CERA | Surgical Team)
  • /u/DrLauren Dr Lauren Ayton (Centre for Eye Research Australia; CERA | Clinical Team)
  • /u/n_c_s Mr Nicholas Sinclair (Bionics Institute; BI | Psychophysics Team)
  • /u/DrChrisMc Dr Chris McCarthy (National ICT Australia; NICTA | Vision Processing Team)
  • /u/T-LB Ms Tamara Brawn (Bionic Vision Australia; BVA | Management Team)

We will be responding from our individual accounts so that we can get through questions more efficiently. Note that Dianne is a proficient internet user and she will be typing for herself.


Please ask Dianne questions about her experiences using her prototype bionic eye device. If you have technical/scientific/clinical questions then we’ll do our best to answer them. We’d like you to come away from this with a clear understanding of how a bionic eye works! There may be certain things that we can’t discuss (e.g. unpublished data, patents, commercial aspects, and some aspects of the studies which are subject to privacy and ethical confidentiality).

TL;DR: Dianne Ashworth has progressively lost her vision over the past 30 years. She is the first person in the world to receive this kind of prototype bionic eye – a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis. She is here with members of the research team from Bionic Vision Australia who developed her device. Together we’ll try to answer your questions about her experiences and the science behind bionic eyes!


*Edit - Jonathan has had to leave, but the rest of us will keep answering your questions.

*Edit2 - Thank you reddit for your fantastic questions. It's been fun and hopefully you've learned something about bionic eyes. We're heading back to the lab now!

Comments: 98 • Responses: 8  • Date: 

musicalbenj12 karma

Bionic Vision team, did a love of Sci-Fi inspire any of you to conduct the research and work that you do? If so, was there a particular Sci-Fi work that inspired you?

xeiss10 karma

We often say among ourselves that these innovations are like something out of a sci-fi! As a kid I would never have believed it possible, let alone be part of the research myself.

Oh and yes, I think a lot of us love sci-fi. It probably inspired many to follow a scientific career. But just to be clear - we're not creating a T-800 here!

robnewby10 karma

Hi Dianne and Team! I read in one of the articles that you are limited to mostly black and white images. How clear are these images to you as the end user? And has this implant had any effect on you sleeping?

DrLauren2 karma

Colour vision is a real challenge for bionic eye devices, as there are a number of different cell types that respond to different coloured light in a normal eye (called the S, M and L photoreceptors, see if you are interested). The electrodes will always be larger than those cells, and so it is hard to replicate just one colour with a bionic eye device.

cathedrameregulaemea2 karma

The electrodes will always be larger than those cells

Sounds like a challenge... ENGINEERS...UNITE!

n_c_s3 karma

We are definitely up for the challenge! There are lots of things to consider when trying to make electrodes smaller, including finding materials that can be physically made that small and can safely deliver electrical stimulation.

cathedrameregulaemea1 karma

How many Volts is each stimulus? Also, what's the electrical ground? The surrounding cells?

This isn't specific to the eye, but from high-school biology, I know that neuronal firing is an all or nothing event... but if I remember correctly, that's with respect to the mechanics of the triggering of the Na+/K+ channels. Since you're directly delivering a potential to the cell body/axons - can you bypass the all-or-nothing and achieve partial excitation?

xeiss1 karma

Regarding the partial activation question. It's certainly an interesting thought. But we do need the retinal ganglion cells (which are the cell bodies of the optic nerve) to fire action potentials - otherwise, the signal won't get to the brain.

Shouldbeworking226 karma

How does the bionic eye work?

xeiss4 karma

Thanks for having us reddit! We're excited to answer your questions. We had a feeling that this would be a question that would come up so we've prepared a PDF with some background material. You can download it here:

xeiss6 karma

(I'm just sneaking back to leave this ITT. This is the text from the above PDF, which I'm about to delete from my dropbox. Thanks again for your great questions reddit! Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions.)



In 2009, the Australian government announced a Special Research Initiative directed towards restoring vision. The rationale being that Australian scientists could leverage the considerable knowledge and experience gained from the development of the cochlear implant 30 years earlier, to develop a retinal implant to provide a sense of vision to people with significant vision loss. Hence a consortium was formed, Bionic Vision Australia (BVA), made up of several universities and research institutes distributed across Australia. The members of the consortium are:

With supporting partners:

  • National Vision Research Institute,
  • University of Western Sydney, and
  • Royal Victoran Eye and Ear Hospital

It is truly a multidisciplinary effort with over 130 researchers and 50 graduate students currently working on device design, materials, stimulation/vision processing strategies, safety and efficacy testing, electronics, clinical outcomes, surgical approaches etc . You can read more about BVA here: There is a glossary here if you are unsure of the meaning of some of the words we use:

Test participants:

In 2012, Dianne Ashworth, Murray Rowland and Maurice Skehan were implanted with retinal prostheses (that is, “bionic eyes”) in Melbourne, Australia. The device was implanted between the sclera and the choroid layers of the eye, making it a “suprachoroidal” retinal prosthesis. All three people have a condition known as retinitis pigmentosa, which is the most common form of inherited blindness. They all have significant vision loss and have almost no light perception remaining. They volunteered to be research participants in this pioneering scientific study.


Retinitis pigmentosa leads to a progressive loss of photoreceptors, the specialised cells in the retina responsible for converting light into neural signals. However, other cells of the retina remain functional. An electrode array positioned in the eye close to the remaining relatively healthy retinal cells can directly activate neural responses in the optic nerve through focused electrical stimulation. Because the retina is mapped to the visual space, the patterns of electrical stimulation delivered in the retina are maintained throughout the visual pathways of the brain and are perceived as equivalent patches of light known as ‘phosphenes’. This is the same principle which the cochlear implant (bionic ear) uses to stimulate the auditory pathway in deaf patients. For a recent review of the scientific literature on visual prostheses, if you have a library subscription, you can check out:


The device implanted into our three patients was a prototype device, intended to help researchers learn about how the brain interprets information from an implant like this. It is made up of a conformable medical grade silicone carrier with platinum disc-shaped electrodes arranged in a hexagonal grid. A thin platinum cable consisting of 24 wires wrapped in a helix connects the electrode array in the eye to a titanium connector that is fixed to the skull behind the ear. You can see a photo of the device here:

The implant is connected to a laboratory stimulator that provides electrical stimulation to the electrodes in the eye. By activating various combinations of these electrodes, rudimentary patterns can be formed and perceived by the patients, much like pixels on a screen. This video explains the basic principle:


It was originally thought that a very large number of small electrodes would be needed to create a high resolution image. However, this has yet to be shown experimentally and there are many technical reasons why this is difficult to do safely – ask us about it if you’re interested. Researchers within BVA are working towards overcoming these hurdles for vision tasks where ‘high-acuity’ is required, such as reading and face recognition. However, our present device is aimed at providing a wide field-of-view implant for navigation purposes, for which high resolution is not required. The suprachoroidal placement is minimally invasive and considered to a safe and stable location for a retinal implant.

Worldwide Effort:

The Australian BVA group is one of several working to provide artificial sight to people who have lost their vision due to conditions such as retinitis pigmentosa. Two other groups (from USA [] and Germany []) have recently received regulatory approval to commercialise their devices. These groups use different surgical approaches and different types of implant technology. A Japanese group has also used a similar approach to ours in a couple of patients and there are a handful of other groups around the world currently developing clinical devices. A team at Monash University in Melbourne, which was also funded through the same Australian government initiative, are developing a different technology which aims to provide electrical stimulation directly to the brain. Although all the groups worldwide are engaged in healthy scientific competition, we are all still working towards the same outcome (restoring a sense of vision to those who have lost it) and share our research findings regularly at conferences and in publications. We can discuss the technical differences and the rationale for our design/approach if you are interested.

Study Workflow:

Our current bionic eye device was designed and tested in Melbourne in a range of preclinical studies (2008 – 2012; Bionics Institute). Concurrently we refined the clinical procedures, the surgical approach and selected the patients (Centre for Eye Research Australia). The implants were anatomically fitted for clinical use and manufactured by the Bionics Institute (2011-2012) and following the implant surgeries (2012; Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital), the patients were closely monitored by clinicians in a 24 month clinical trial. Responses to stimulation of the electrodes in the patients’ eyes were extensively tested in psychophysics studies (2012 – 2014). Finally, the patients were fitted with cameras and vision processors, and they were able to undertake basic daily living tasks and navigate obstacles (2014; Centre for Eye Research Australia and National ICT Australia, Canberra). We are now nearing the end of this patient study. The clinical trial is registered here:


We are now developing next-generation bionic eye implants, the first of which will have double the number of electrodes to the first prosthesis (covering twice the visual field). It will be fully implantable and the patients will be able to take this device out of the laboratory to use at home in their daily lives. The other BVA technology in development and preclinical testing include a suprachoroidal device with 98 stimulating electrodes and a completely novel device with 256-1000 electrodes made from diamond. The Australian government grant (through BVA) will end in December 2014, so we are currently seeking funding to continue our research and commence patient tests with the first of the next generation devices.


xeiss3 karma

Essentially, an electrode array is implanted near the patients retina. This electrode array provides electrical stimulation which directly activates their optic nerve - bypassing the damaged photoreceptor. The patterns of stimulation in the eye are derived from a camera/vision processor and are seen as spots of light by the patient. By controlling the pattern of stimulation delivered to the array, we can control the image that the patients perceive.

ForUrsula3 karma

So you are replacing the function of the eye itself, and still using the optic nerve? Does this mean that it would not work on people born blind etc? and only work on people whos vision is lost due to issues with the eye itself?

xeiss2 karma

Yes, that's correct. Retinal prostheses target patients with degenerative retinal disease, such as retinitis pigmentosa or age-related macular degeneration. There are some research teams working on cortical devices (e.g. Monash Vision Group, Australia; and CORTIVIS, Spain) which directly stimulate the visual part of the brain. This has pros and cons.

zacmacnma6 karma

Hi Dianne and Team, Dianne, did you think that you got better at being able to interpret the images from your bionic eye the longer you wore it - as in, in what ways did you find your brain learning to see with it?

diashworth2 karma

That is actually what happened! Over time I became more used to what I was seeing and could use it in different situations like finding things on the table

zacmacnma1 karma

that's pretty exciting! what was the thing or situation you found most satisfying that you could do with your bionic eye? What type of thing was easiest and what was hardest?

diashworth1 karma

I don't think things were easier or harder, as it was just a learning process and everything became easier as I went along. I enjoyed the social aspect of the additional vision and working with the BVA team

zacmacnma2 karma

I am a bit in awe - you are a real pioneer! and it's great to be able to ask (almost) any questions, thanks! I wonder how you came to decide you wanted to be a bionic eye recipient? and I wonder what sorts of questions the researchers have in mind they want to answer next?

xeiss2 karma

We are working on upgrades for our next generation device. We are interested in a larger visual field coverage - and how that will help our patients to better navigate. We are also interested in how tracking the patients' eyes and dynamically correcting for these movements will provide more useful visual percepts.

*edit - and of course the device gives us a model for investigating basic visual neuroscience questions in much the same way that cochlear implants have unlocked certain fields of auditory neuroscience research. It will be fascinating how this field develops over the coming years.

823643 karma

I'm sure it's a long list but what problems need to be solved for implants to meet and exceed the abilities of our organic "sensors?"

Our own sense of sight is more an interpretation of the light that enters our eyes than an analog of it, I'm led to believe; is this the case with your technology?

Thank you, very much.

xeiss2 karma

It's a good question. There is no tech that even comes close to matching the functionality of an eye. But as you said - the interpretation of the signal is the important thing. For example, a cochlear implant may only have 22 channels of stimulation to cover the auditory spectrum - yet cochlear implant recipients are able to perform incredibly well. This is in large part as a result of neural plasticity. We expect that the same will be the case for bionic eye patients.