zyxzevn

Hi Eric, I have many questions regarding your google lecture on Nuclear Fusion https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhKB-VxJWpg
Answer any that you like / got time for.

1) In the lecture you claim that sustained fusion is easier with your technology, as shown in laboratory results. What is the current status about reaching the goal of sustained fusion?

2) Can you explain why your method can use the chaos that is produced by the heat, and why other technologies can not?

3) In a recent video there are problems with the electric contacts that deliver the electric current. Why do you think beryllium solves this problem?

4) Why do you think you can start fusion based on electro-magnetism? And not with extreme pressure as most fusion devices do.

5) Can this fusion system be scaled down to a chip? It would be great to have a fusion device in my bike.

6) Do you know about the Safire project and are you working together? (For Safire see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DeVdzSjPx0g)

I have more questions but I think I will give you some time for these first.

Hi Wim. I have similar experiences, and I am doing a lot of meditations /energy-work. But I have no records of any kind (yet).
My focus is more into the link between the spiritual world and science. I post my stuff in the subreddit /r/paradigmchange

I have some ideas about the physical background behind all this. Are you available in NL to discuss some ideas or even do some tests?

Some other questions:

I met some breathing techniques in yoga (pranayama). Is your technique based on that?

What (scientific) theories do you use to explain the extreme things that you do? Or things like prana/chi?

Some deep scientific stuff here, which I love to read:
"There are no particles, there are only fields" Or:
"There are no particles, there are no fields"
And it raises some questions:
Isn't the concept of particles completely false? Does light or matter actually move in particles? How is light different from a wave? What are the alternatives? Does it affect quantum computing?

With any possible false flag, one should first look critically at the physics of the event. This excludes all manipulations of people pushing a certain agenda. How does your system incorporate basic physics? And how does your system identify narratives / agendas?

How can the system become more democratic or fair?