zoopl

Legitimately fascinating read, even without great juridical knowledge.

Wow, I didn't expect you to still be around. I just wanted to convince other readers to look into it.

Aside from the disturbing descriptions of the offences I just kinda skimmed, I couldn't stop being intrigued by Peter Kidd's structured and sober way of reasoning. At the same time he never came off as cold or indifferent (I also watched part of it on youtube). I don't know much about Judges and what makes a good one, but he made me wanna be one ^^

e:spelling