wijenshjehebehfjj
Highest Rated Comments
wijenshjehebehfjj-2 karma
Because it lets the court reverse-engineer justification for however it wanted to rule. The text doesn’t say what you want it to say? No problem, scour vaguely-defined “history” until you find what you need. Still came up empty? Point to a “tradition” (whatever that means) and you’re good to go. Not to mention all the problems with turning judges into armchair historians, or the premise that whoever made the law 200 years ago was actually making scripture and would do the same thing today given current facts.
wijenshjehebehfjj-3 karma
“(Text), history and tradition” is nothing but a Rorschach test. How serious people can say otherwise with a straight face blows my mind.
wijenshjehebehfjj-12 karma
Nothing you said contradicts what I said, you just pretend it’s somehow objective.
wijenshjehebehfjj4 karma
Do you think that the burn was necessary or would other options (like pumping to new containers, etc) be available? Of course there is suspicion that NS took the easiest/cheapest route to avoid an explosion.
View HistoryShare Link