varmint700

<sigh>

Right, I get that, but wouldn’t you as a player be happy to know your odds of winning life-changing amounts of money were 1000x better? Surely that psychology could be nurtured into marketing. I mean I would sure as he’ll be more inclined to play under those conditions than these.

I’ve always been confused as to why these giant virtually impossible payouts exist. Why don’t lotteries reduce the odds in order to distribute more wealth to more individuals into the economy? Surely there’s more benefit to wider distribution of wealth both in terms of spending and taxation. Thus makes zero sense to me. Why not generate 1000 millionaires instead of 1 billionaire that simply hoards the money into partnerships and leeches interest?