uber_kitty

You are not afraid at all that it gives license to any private religious company to limit the rights of their employees based on a non shared religious belief?

What if Mormons don't want to pay for blood transfusions?

What if pastafarians don't want to pay for coeliac disease treatment?

Where is the line?

Why did he always have half his hand under his belt?

You are supporting exclusionary practices. Your alternatives are naive and laughable.

According to you, if a company's religon stated that providing safe working environments was evil, would you allow them to conduct business without proper safety precautions? The belief about safety will be forced upon them. Employees can just work somewhere else, right?