thecyclingman

Wrong. A Congressional review board and at least one federal judge have already determined that the NSA's current activity is illegal and must be stopped. And many of the revelations are just coming out. Only a tiny fraction have been subject to review. As someone with a juris doctor I can confirm the NSA has many programs that violate the 4th Amendment's prohibition on search and seizer. All they have done is opportunistically pretend the Bill of Rights doesn't exist in the digital realm because it's relatively new. The only question is how slavishly authoritarian the stacked federal courts are in America in 2014.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2014/0123/NSA-data-sweeps-are-illegal-and-should-be-stopped-report-says-video

"A federal district judge ruled on Monday that the National Security Agency program that is systematically keeping records of all Americans’ phone calls most likely violates the Constitution, describing its technology as “almost Orwellian” and suggesting that James Madison would be “aghast” to learn that the government was encroaching on liberty in such a way."

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/17/us/politics/federal-judge-rules-against-nsa-phone-data-program.html?_r=0

Whether 150 curls "should have not" done this is irrelevant from the standpoint of the physicians running the study given the readily apparent physical symptoms illustrated he probably had the rhabdomyolysis.

This is actually pretty hilarious, I'm going to gather much of it is intentional: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ij3vmEtgPDE