Besides the "I have power over you" motivation, did you find that the perpetrators did what they did because someone else did it to them as well? Something like "I've had this done to me, so I am doing it to you". Or was that not a differentiator at all in terms of who were the attackers?
And how higher up in the hierarchy were the attackers - much higher, just above the victims, or neither in particular? (I've never been in the military, but I assume that they wouldn't attack someone above them. Or is that an invalid assumption?)
tastystrudel27 karma
Besides the "I have power over you" motivation, did you find that the perpetrators did what they did because someone else did it to them as well? Something like "I've had this done to me, so I am doing it to you". Or was that not a differentiator at all in terms of who were the attackers?
And how higher up in the hierarchy were the attackers - much higher, just above the victims, or neither in particular? (I've never been in the military, but I assume that they wouldn't attack someone above them. Or is that an invalid assumption?)
View HistoryShare Link