Highest Rated Comments
sprgrss74 karma
Because a jury determined that he hired the killer to kill his employer to cover up his embezzlement then helped his accomplice cover up the crime.
sprgrss68 karma
The problem here is that there is NO direct evidence tying Glossip to the murder and yet he is on death row. Shit is fucked up.
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ok-court-of-criminal-appeals/1466730.html
sprgrss303 karma
Here are my questions:
How do you account for the $1,200 that was found in your possession?
How do you account for telling investigators that you had seen Barry Van Treese at 7am in the morning and that he was going Wal-Mart
How do you account for telling investigators at another time that you had seen Barry Van Treese at 4:30 in the morning then later saying it was 8pm the night before?
How do you account for the discrepancies in the hotels books?
How do you account for telling investigators that a "cowboy from across the street" was one of the people who broke the window?
How do you account for telling people the day after that you were moving on?
How do you account for telling people that Van Treese stayed in Room 108 when you knew he was in room 102?
How do you account for telling the hotel staff to clean the upper floors while you and Sneed would clean the 1st Floor?
How do you account for all of your multiple accounts and the various discrepancies between your accounts?
View HistoryShare Link