snoboreddotcom
Highest Rated Comments
snoboreddotcom219 karma
According to the link posted by the AMA person they did find a chokehold.
The link the other guy posted is that the Chief surgeon within internal affairs said it wasn't, but thats not the same as internal affairs ruling it wasnt an illegal choke-hold.
snoboreddotcom104 karma
Internal affairs looked at the video, testimony and the body to determine if there was a chokehold.
The chief surgeon said in his opinion the body did not have signs of a chokehold.
The other evidence, in the opinion of internal affairs, was good enough to say there was a chokehold. It is possible for a chokehold to occur even without it being clear from the body
The guy saying they found they didnt use a chokehold used a link talking about the policeman's attorney saying the chief surgeon found nothing. He then wrongly used this to assert that the whole investigation found the same as the chief surgeon.
snoboreddotcom34 karma
Sometimes you gotta live on the edge to feel alive. The adrenaline rush of knowing you might slip at any moment
snoboreddotcom28 karma
He said it wasn't but according to the link IA decided it was anyways.
In other words they got one piece of information from the chief surgeon, looked at other information they had and decided the other information was better than the surgeon's opinion
snoboreddotcom272 karma
Whats a bad way to misspell Jennifer Aniston?
View HistoryShare Link