sniperhiding

Context really matters. I've done this before (pre seddit long before this post existed) and she wanted it. Did I ask her first? No. It was implied by her body language and other talk preceding it. Smile on her face later that night makes me think she did. So context matters. I bet if this line was in a romance novel and the man's name was christian grey, women would LOVE reading about it.

Yeah I am seeing that too. They take the 10% of the female population that are truly scum and make the whole gender out to be that way.

I would love to know why the F*** someone would ask you a question, and then delete it. For those who can't figure out the question based on TofuTofu's response, it was basically "what's your thoughts on /r/TheRedPill". And the questioner thought they were scum.

This whole situation pisses me off.

Context matters. I've used the same dick in hand move on a girl. Did I verbally ask her permission first? "Will you let me place your hand on my penis?" No. Did she cry rape? No.

Sorry to hurt your feelings feminists. She LOVED it. EDIT: She even told me that THAT very move was what REALLY made her kick it into top gear. Great night. And we had sex 2-3 more times after over the following week or so before we went separate ways.

What was already established was that we were already under covers in her bed, half naked, making out hard. That's the context folks, that the feminists CLEARLY OVERLOOKED. There was a whole lot that went on before the dick in hand move that they just conveniently ignored. But I bet if this was in a 50 shades romance novel or some Magic Mike movie, they would be eating it up!!!!!!

What Tofu did wrong: He didn't carefully write his post to show readers the full context leading up to it. But it's NOT rape or assault.

What the butthurt feminists did WAY wrong: They had 3 options on how to respond to this.

One: do nothing and just ignore it. Surprise, I am NOT condoning this approach.

Two: their actual response. "OMG OMG OMG RAPE RAPE RAPE. He wants to abuse women, rape them, and teach others how to do it". Really mature.

Three: when they read it, I can understand taking it out of context (Tofu's not so good writing), but first reach out to the author to get his side and clear up any confusion. Basically throw a red flag, and start asking questions first. Assume good intent, and get both sides to the story.

Obviously, the third option would have been the mature way to go. But no, running a man's name in the ground accusing him of rape is just too fun for witch hunters.

tl;dr that blogger Casey Malone is a brain dead fucktard.

Edit: Sorry for hijacking Tofu. Since this is an AMA and I need to ask a question....

How is your day today?

NOTE: My harsh opinion is mine and mine alone. I do not speak for Ken/Tofu. Just myself (and probably a lot of people out there).

It's interesting that 1. you are good at the game, and 2. you happen to be in (and are good at) sales as a career. I dabbled in sales back in the early 2000s and I was f*****g terrible at it. My inner game was shit, complete shit. I am still convinced that I am not meant to be in sales, and what made me reach that conclusion was that all the guys who were good at their jobs were just natural with people. I was not. It seemed like the good ones were "quick on their feet", always having something good to say just flow out of their mouth, whereas I just analyze it and try to think of something to respond with.

(or it was a girl salesperson who was hot- thus her success). So part of me wonders....

If some people are just not cut out to be in sales, and thus won't really reach the level you are at in game either....

or...

If we got good with game, with people, if almost anyone could be good at sales.

Basically I see a strong connection between the two, and hearing you be in sales and being successful at game, I am not surprised. So I naturally question whether I would be good at it like you.

Not really a question, more so just thinking out loud.