Highest Rated Comments


skyandbray37 karma

Dude is getting his ass handed to him and it's kind of deserved. This post is SEO optimized to the tits and hit every marketing buzzword. Even threw in a kitten picture he made sure to mention he adopted lol.

So it's software that detects gun shaped like objects being carried by a person. When they are inevitably riddled with false positives, it gets sent off to a human who verifies it before sounding the alarm.

You basically invented a security guard. You know, a guy who watches TV monitors? This is just that with extra steps. What happens when your 3rd party verifier mistakenly waves through a false positive? Are you getting sued for causing deadly force?

This is classic tech bro. This is Elon Musk inventing the shittier subway. You found a way to profit off of dead children and didn't even do it well.

skyandbray37 karma

My local dispo sells these already.

skyandbray19 karma

Because fuck poor kids, right?

skyandbray5 karma

Hillary Duff answered half a question and split.

skyandbray4 karma

Except the OP mentioned that it only works once the weapon is drawn, and it's only use is to "communicate" with relevant agencies.

That isn't a current problem needing to be solved by AI. The time it takes to get sent to a 3rd party verifier, approved, and than all information is sent to LEO and whatnot, people are already dead. 911 calls are already blowing up. This MIGHT save a couple of minutes, tops, but carnage has already begun. This is assuming the perfect scenario where the gun is recognized early and a verifier was immediately available. Not to mention that its way too late if the shooting began off camera. Unless it goes from Drawn weapon to LEO is contacted and deployed within 2 minutes, it's not speeding up shit. 911 calls already began before that point in Uvalde. OPs tech would have already been too late.

OP found a way to get his beak wet on the backs of dead children, full stop.