sethstorm

So how does it feel to be pushing pseudoscience?

Officially: no reason. And I get this; I vaguely know how CA employment law works and that you limit your liability by not stating a reason. It's also really hard to work through in your mind.

The best theory I have is that, two weeks earlier, I raised concerns about donating 10% of ad revenue to charity. Some management likes getting feedback, some doesn't.

The reason I had concerns was that this was revenue, not income. That means you need ~10% margins to break even. This can be hard to do; Yahoo and Twitter don't. Salesforce does something similar, but it's more all-around, and in a way that promotes the product without risking the company's financials.

Still think this is a comment that is worth being deep-sixed to oblivion?

Deregulation. Can't attack what's not there.

If it's so good, environmentalism won't need protection.

That's just blatant theft, especially if you try the shell game of "dividends".

In other words, mayors that would rather listen to Aspen environmentalists than the concerns of their own population.