sadeasement

I noticed that your reports tend to have a lot of matches, whereas Embark will usually have like 6 maximum and everything else is "supermutt". Do you think your low-percentage matches are accurate? If not, do you think it's something that will be improved on as you get more data?

Example from the fabulous r/doggydna sub

(Edited because my original phrasing didn't make sense)

Another question -- I always hear that you're 98% accurate, but how do you assess accuracy in this case?

Awesome! Thank you! Very cool work!

Thank you! That makes sense that it's based on cross-validation! Cool that there is dog data science :)