raineyr

Thanks for being a member! The majority of our funding comes from small individual donors like you. We've got about 16,500 members right now, and we don't accept money from the government. Having small individual members helps us stay focused on defending users' rights, not being beholden to a handful of large donors or granting offices. Your donation helps us pay for everything from servers to graphic design, but the majority of our annual budgets goes to pay for staff: technologists, lawyers, activists (like us!), international policy experts, and a small administrative staff. Other folks who want to join can do so here: https://supporters.eff.org/join

We also have a team dedicated to just International issues, including many that affect Canada! Here are two recent blog posts on our neighbors to the north: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/11/northern-exposure-unmasking-online-spying-canada & https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2011/10/canada-warrantless%20digital%20surveillance

Hi, great question. We've been following the situation in Ireland very closely, and we're deeply concerned. Recently, we launched a worldwide campaign to track efforts to turn Internet intermediaries into copyright police: https://globalchokepoints.org/ Through Global Chokepoints, we'll be working to coordinate worldwide activism against these misguided copyright initiatives. Check out the page we have on Ireland: https://globalchokepoints.org/countries/ireland This is going to be our anchor page for fighting misguided copyright initiatives in Ireland, and we'll coordinate with groups in Ireland. Stay tuned.

Stay tuned.

Congress wants to appear as if it’s doing “something” about Internet security. But the truth is that the proposals they’re suggesting don’t address most of the major network security issues. From social engineering to two-step authentication, from the broken CA system to encrypting the web, there are concrete and real issues around network security that can and should be addressed (though a lot of them aren’t legislative solutions). Instead of grappling with these issues, Congress is trying to push an information “sharing” bill that would undermine existing privacy laws.

Also joining is @TrevorEFF, EFF activist extraordinaire.