pleasureincontempt

I have a quick question. My mother was in a collision where she was t-boned at a 4-way stop. After the investigation it was determined that she was 100% not at fault. No rate increases or anything, but what confuses me is that her insurance company paid for the damages eventhough the other driver was insured. There was a name for it (a reason) but I don't recall it. What would the motivation for such a policy be?

WTF? I only got 15% When I worked there. Basically only the tax off.

I'm pretty badass at FSX. I can even land a 747 on a runway without using my rudders on full realism. If a pilot were to suffer illness would I presumably be able to land a real aircraft?

Kimmel and Silverman? I call BS! Jimmy and Sarah.

[removed]