mrshulgin

EDIT: OP has replied below.

I couldn't find any.

Also it seems as if the SGB procedure itself (which the novel procedure is based on) has mediocre evidence at best for its effectiveness at treating PTSD.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442253/

First, SGB studies have generally been underpowered to adequately measure the most clinically important outcomes of remission, response, and serious adverse events. Second, although SGB has been recommended for use as an adjuvant for other therapies,53 evidence is insufficient to support recommendations about specifically when to initiate SGB in the order of recommended conventional pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies.

and

Findings from the first RCT of SGB for PTSD were inconclusive, neither confirming nor refuting findings of rapid and high rates of clinically relevant improvement and low risk of serious adverse events from unblinded, uncontrolled case series. It is appropriate to listen to criticism of the RCT, envision a better study of SGB for PTSD, and investigate whether SGB should be a higher priority than other innovative treatments for PTSD.

When the first search results were for their (Stella's) own website, I knew we were in trouble lol.

Do you feel that the industry has changed at all in recent years to put more pressure on ground staff to do things quickly at the expense of safety?

In reference to a video by Blancolirio about the ramper fatality in December.

How widespread is "lab shopping" (finding a lab that will inflate your THC/CBD numbers)?

And do states have provisions in place which require labs to be independent? If I were a shady cannabis cultivator who got big, the first thing I'd do is buy a lab myself to do all of my testing for me.

That clause depends on the preceding clause being true.

"They can impact certain diseases" IF "there is a link between phytocannabinoids/cannabis and immunity."