lottapoppa

What does it matter when there's no legally recognized method for proving your traffic is being meddled with?

What's the proposal for how to enforce "net neutrality" in a system that ultimately wants it's people to believe false advertising is illegal and the fine outweighs profits, when in fact nothing could be further from the truth?

All this support to get a law that can't be enforced is just people distracted from the problem. Internet companies have monopolies, monopolies are already something they're supposed to be regulating.

This is like asking the janitor to restrict sneakers from walking on the floor because the janitor doesn't clean sneaker marks.

Want a fix, get your local government to take back management of government assets like telephone poles and conduits, and let local networks arise. Verizon/Comcast/TWC manage the majority of town/city/state infrastructure and in places as "developed" as NYC, Verizon literally holds up competitors from expanding as the city defers to VZW for controlling access to the "common infrastructure"

Would you be willing to document the whole process, as a sort of tutorial, to encourage others to follow your steps?

Isps can also easily gurantee minimum up-speeds. If your network is slower than promised they are either throttling you or making promises on infrastructure they can not support.

It is either a violation of NN or false advertising. There is no grey area or inbetween.

This doesn't do anything but support my questions.