jubbergun

It's got to be a bit of blow to the ego that the top two posts in this AMA are "isn't your pal really swell?"

Jimmy can't won't even keep his own website neutral.

FTFY

The guy couldn't even get his own birthday accurately reflected because source>truth and there's a cabal of nutjob editors/admins who commit shenanigans then back each other up when they're called on their inappropriate behavior. Wikipedia hasn't gotten a dime out of me since the gamergate article fiasco that still isn't adequately resolved. "Sources" that are involved with a controversial subject should not be regarded as usable on that subject, and there needs to be a better mechanism to deal with editors/admins who are in clear violation of the rules than that stupid committee.

I'm trying to puzzle out how "what was described in the documents was factual" if the documents themselves weren't authentic.

I'm not saying his pals aren't really swell. I'm just saying that when it's your AMA the focus should be on you, not on your pals. It's like when you talk up a woman in a bar for 20 minutes then she says, "could you introduce me to your friend?" You introduce them, because that's just good form, but it still stings, you know what I mean?

So you're saying Senator Rubio, who was the only republican who actually asked hard questions -- indicating he wasn't just rolling over for the sake of politics and party loyalty -- is "spineless" because he chose not to vote the way you wanted? That seems like a pretty juvenile response coming from an educated professional.