jpb225

For me, it isn't so much about accuracy, which is virtually perfect with both systems, it's more about real time transcription and being able to see what you're typing as you're speaking, as well as the ability to easily select the correct alternative on occasions when it does get it wrong.

Of course I realize that you're not going to implement a competing technology directly into your product no matter how much better it might be, but it would be great to see feature parity. The current lackluster voice typing is the only thing that makes me want to go back to another keyboard.

I'm afraid you've got the outcome of Terry backwards. The Court found the stop and frisk reasonable, and affirmed the appellate court's ruling.

E: Downvote if you like, I really couldn't care less, but you're still incorrect. That was the exact opposite of the holding in Terry v. Ohio.

Federal law only trumps state law when the two are in direct conflict. Federal legalization doesn't conflict with state bans. As separate sovereigns, the states are free to have their own more restrictive policies.

The federal government doesn't even have the power to require states to legalize. If they tried, it would be unconstitutional.

Federal legalization would be a major step though, since it would allow for true legalization in states that want it.