jhafetz43 karma2017-12-13 19:50:11 UTC
Are you Warlizard of the Warlizard gaming forum?
View HistoryShare Link
jhafetz33 karma2017-12-13 19:33:51 UTC
Standing is an issue before the Court now. But it's clear from precedent that under these type of extreme circumstances--where gov't is not releasing citizen's name, the gov't has confirmed the citizen wants to speak to a lawyer, and no family member is before the court to assert the detained citizen's rights. Otherwise, you have an effective suspension of habeas corpus by the executive, which is illegal.
jhafetz32 karma2017-12-13 19:05:00 UTC
That's a good question. The government hasn't given a reason other than saying it's to protect his privacy. But that's a flimsy excuse. In America, we don't have secret detention.
jhafetz31 karma2017-12-13 19:19:21 UTC
Military detention is NOT military jurisdiction. The Supreme Court has said over and over again that federal courts can review the legality of a citizen's detention. See the Hamdi case (https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/03-6696.ZO.html), and see especially Justice Scalia's opinion if you have any doubts on this matter--that will resolve them!
jhafetz26 karma2017-12-13 19:03:45 UTC
Hi, I'm Jonathan Hafetz at the ACLU. Happy to answer questions on why this case matters if you care about the Constitution.
Copyright © 2014 BestofAMA.com, All rights reserved.
reddit has not approved or endorsed BestofAMA, reddit design elements are trademarks of reddit inc.