Thanks for taking the time to answer some questions!
From my understanding of QI, it protects some of these government agencies from frivolous litigations, which leads to some bad results for the public who may have suffered some damages from a government agent. Still, abolishing QI would have some unfavorable and costly consequences as the costs of defending these individuals would be borne by the taxpayers, including frivolous lawsuits. (I'm not very read up on QI so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong!)
Are you suggesting getting rid of QI completely, or do you have some alternative that you would like to see in its place? Thanks again.
hollandrd35 karma
Thanks for taking the time to answer some questions!
From my understanding of QI, it protects some of these government agencies from frivolous litigations, which leads to some bad results for the public who may have suffered some damages from a government agent. Still, abolishing QI would have some unfavorable and costly consequences as the costs of defending these individuals would be borne by the taxpayers, including frivolous lawsuits. (I'm not very read up on QI so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong!)
Are you suggesting getting rid of QI completely, or do you have some alternative that you would like to see in its place? Thanks again.
View HistoryShare Link