historycat95

Are you allowed to discuss the human rights violations which were used to build the venues?

Because the court can decide which cases are heard and can reject others from being heard, doesn't that ability to decide by not hearing a case mean that ethics rules shouldn't be limited to the cases it hears?

Why can a wealthy person become generous friends with a justice, then file an amicus brief on any case they wish, and not be in violation of ethics rules?

It seems the court is perfectly positioned to be corrupt, yet have the most lax ethics rules.

How did the phrase "canadian tuxedo" come about to describe denim jacket with jeans?

What's the earliest forest fire we have on record?