You mark a turning point in the book when you point out that “they decided to cheat” on the tests because the Edison didn’t work.
Stepping back to the broader question, when do you think Holmes decided to commit a crime? Was it more like the frog boiling in the pot that got out of her control, or was she the type of person that, from the beginning, just didn’t care if people got hurt? You address this a bit in the epilogue, but I’m curious if you can point to a specific moment.
As an aside, it was fun chatting with you on a flight back from DC about two years ago. I remember you said the book was gonna have a lot of incredible details that weren’t in the WSJ articles. You weren’t kidding.
harddata232 karma
You mark a turning point in the book when you point out that “they decided to cheat” on the tests because the Edison didn’t work.
Stepping back to the broader question, when do you think Holmes decided to commit a crime? Was it more like the frog boiling in the pot that got out of her control, or was she the type of person that, from the beginning, just didn’t care if people got hurt? You address this a bit in the epilogue, but I’m curious if you can point to a specific moment.
As an aside, it was fun chatting with you on a flight back from DC about two years ago. I remember you said the book was gonna have a lot of incredible details that weren’t in the WSJ articles. You weren’t kidding.
View HistoryShare Link