graaahh

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_mavzhlFH9l1qitese.gif

The last 4-5 were pretty bad, but honestly the entire series was rife with body horror and some pretty dark moral tones.

Is there any chance that Chicago Unit Acquisition LLC borrows money from foreign sources and loans the same amount to Donald Trump so its debts equal its assets and it can be ignored on financial reports? In essence allowing Trump to borrow from foreign sources without reporting it as such?

Is this comic about you?

I really hope you see this because I'll probably never get the chance to ask someone so close to the source. Of the 3% of scientists who are not part of the consensus, is full 3% scientists who don't believe the climate is changing at all unusually? Or is it a mix of non-consensus viewpoints about climate? (e.g. Climate is changing rapidly but it's not anthropogenic in origin, climate is not changing, climate might be changing but it isn't clear, etc.)

Basically, how would you characterize the viewpoints of the dissenting 3% on climate? The reason I ask is because I want to believe that even as strong as the consensus is, it should be stronger, and I don't know how strongly the remaining 3% actually disagrees with the consensus (in essence, I don't know how you determined where to draw the line between "agrees" and "disagrees".)