gethereddout

That's very interesting although I can't say I'm surprised to hear it- almost everyone involved with the actual events of that day is aware of things that don't jive with the official story. That's what happens when you fabricate an event that involves so many people.

If you are interested in learning more, this is DRG's book that goes into great detail about why the official account of the planes is surely false. Really your position "on the fence" here is untenable from a psychological standpoint, so check it out.

Yeah, it was. And I'd be curious what OP has to say about David Ray Griffin's thorough analysis of the many inherent contradictions in the official accounts of the plane movements and official responses. To give just one example, in order to accept the current NORAD version, one must also accept that they were lying for five years when claiming the former version. Most folks who have "accepted" the official story don't even really understand the logical contradictions and gross statistical improbabilities they are placing their confidence in.