fuckyouasshole2

It's different groups of people doing the AMA and some might be more suitable to comment than others. In another comment the nice gal who seems to be doing the writing said a lot of people were only scheduled until 5 but said she'd forward questions and update with answers. 5:00 was an hour and 40 minutes ago and this question is an hour old. Hold your horses!

Nobody can spell that shit!

Wow, neat!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_board_game_Monopoly

And awesome AMA!!

Do you have a link to it and info about what group is putting it forward? Are all these groups working on the same amendment?

-Here's where dad7025 commented with links if any of you all wanted to look. Doesn't seem like very focused criticism but more of a linkdump. I don't know if I feel like fishing for something that matches but there it is.

-I haven't really dug into comments yet but from random responses Dad7025 has made I don't think he feels like supporting what he's saying and would rather have other comments make quotes from the texts he's linked or speak on his behalf. Whatever..

Ok, fuck you asshole. I did do that in other comments. And other people made the arguments for me in yet other comments. But if you need me to hold your hand, I'll accept your challenge.

The proposed amendments empower the government to regulate money spent, by anyone, to "influence elections". Buy advertising, travel to make a speech, use electricity to make a comment on Reddit, it all costs money. So it can all be regulated.

The second part of the equation, Influencing Elections, if broadly construed, includes virtually all political speech, for what kind of political speech isn't intended to influence elections, directly or indirectly?

That's from the "free speech for people" link. The "Move to amend" proposal is even worse.

No, you wanted to make it so schools use your software so that it's standard and that students are groomed on it. Profit was the motive here, you're full of shit.