extragrandeur
Highest Rated Comments
extragrandeur0 karma
hm maybe I'll study some of it and try it out as much as possible. I understand that more time should be spent on going out and talking to women as oppose to studying up routines. But I'm at the point where I know I'm confident and charming enough to have almost no problem opening/hooking sets at bars, kino, getting phone numbers, and sometimes kiss close (still gotta work on the pulls/logistics). The flake/rejection rate is still really high. I'm looking into instead of trying to see if she's attracted to me, I can proactively create intense attraction. For you guys, a lot of attraction building is social proof, charm, confidence, escalation, and (what I call) high status behaviors. But I feel that's just not enough for me to really get the girl. I'm still pretty young and taking this thing one step at a time. Thanks a million for answer my question dude. Looking forward to your book in July. :)
extragrandeur-3 karma
Hi Ken. Huge fan of your book, you have my backing for sure, and I can't wait for your SF seminar. It's interesting to see the evolution from back when Mystery's Method reigns to now the new wave of honesty-first direct approach seduction philosophy introduced by Mark Manson and yourself, to name a few. My question is, how much merit do you see in Ross Jeffries pseudo hypnosis NLP techniques such as eliciting value, anchoring and the usage of trance words? Also I know you guys aren't big on routines but things like palm reading, cold reading, and silly kino games(e.g. thumb war) are golden. Never failed me before.
extragrandeur1 karma
I know direct game works for a lot of guys out there, and honesty first is definitely the way to go. But when almost all your direct game approach has been rejections, you gotta start looking elsewhere.
View HistoryShare Link