so does this mean when someone leaves, there's a slot for sale? or if adding an additional member, there's a redivision of share value? or are 'Full Members' the real owners, and everyone else is 'renting'?
edit: I say this because I believe most communes in the 60s-70s were owned by one or two hippies who had the cash and invited their buddies to hang for a decade, but then when it came to move on they told eveyone the party was over and cashed in. Communes are interesting to me in a capitalist society
esauis24 karma
so does this mean when someone leaves, there's a slot for sale? or if adding an additional member, there's a redivision of share value? or are 'Full Members' the real owners, and everyone else is 'renting'?
edit: I say this because I believe most communes in the 60s-70s were owned by one or two hippies who had the cash and invited their buddies to hang for a decade, but then when it came to move on they told eveyone the party was over and cashed in. Communes are interesting to me in a capitalist society
View HistoryShare Link