enlprod

Hi, Alex. I have been a big supporter for years.

Was wondering what you think of the amount of work/research/publishing that has been done on the down side of the climate change agenda. Seems even people like you can't/don't cite statistics on the huge negative effects. Do you agree? Can that change?

Thanks for answering. I am saying that we need to see headlines (assuming they'd be true) like, "20,000 freeze to death in Europe due to energy poverty," or "300 million to remain in poverty in Africa over next decade due to climate change agenda," or "Thousands go on welfare due to forced coal shutdowns in US." People just think the downside is (slightly) higher fuel bills and less profits for the oil companies. We need to bring to light the huge human cost in suffering. It needs to be made real, emotional and (unfortunately) frightening. Your thoughts?