dtiftw

There is no scientific consensus about GMO products.

Except for, you know, the consensus among scientists.

https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/

Our internal numbers showed us winning big

So did Romney.

Why are you cut any pasting your previous AMA without adding anything substantial?

Why did you refuse to answer the vast majority of questions previously? Why did you create a new account?

http://np.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/cl4boe/my_name_is_ricardo_rangel_substation_design

Edit: do you know that you're a bot?

I think it’s important to be clear that there’s no scientific consensus because there have been studies that go both ways.

So if I find a single study saying that vaccines cause autism, there's not a scientific consensus on that topic?

But I do think it’s important to know about GMO crops and their consumption, that there is no scientific consensus.

https://ec.europa.eu/research/biosociety/pdf/a_decade_of_eu-funded_gmo_research.pdf

No one can argue with the amount of toxic chemicals that are being used in these plantations. No one can argue with the monopoly that’s being accrued off the land in the hands of these megacorporations. No one can argue that the families in Argentina and Africa are actually suffering the consequences of these mega plantations of GMOs.

Simply saying that "no one can argue" doesn't actually mean that your view is correct. That's why we rely on research and the like.

Because there are drills on almost every single day of some sort.

What do you think emergency services does when there isn't an emergency? Play pool?