deevil_knievel

I deleted it because I though I sounded like a dick and didn't want to come off that way. I wish you the best of luck! just didn't know or see why being in mouth was adventageous in anyway. I didn't know so few athletes used an impaxt sensing product at all. that seems crazy considering these types of sensors may have gotten smaller recently, but certainly aren't new technology.

how much more accurate are your sensors by being "closer to the center of gravity of the brain" than sensors in a headband or inside of a helmet?

okay, let me put it this way: what is the difference between your product's readings, what's currently available, and a cg?