Highest Rated Comments
codan8425 karma
All I’m saying is that it seems to be a stretch and likely not to survive judicial review. Such a policy would very likely be challenged and SCOTUS may not agree it is constitutional. There is certainly a question there and it is not unquestionably constitutional.
codan8414 karma
They do seem to have a blind spot in regards any possible challenges or negative consequences of their proposed judicial term limits. It’s to be expected with a group advocating for something to downplay anything that doesn’t support their goals.
codan8429 karma
That doesn’t seem to fit with article 3 section 1. Only one Supreme Court and judges hold their offices during good behavior. There doesn’t seem to be any room for allowing requiring judges to change office for any reason other that lack of good behavior. Moving from the SCOTUS to another court would be removing the judge from their office. I would wager a lot on any such statute not winning a challenge in court.
View HistoryShare Link