I'm surprised these are the highest responses. If the crux of the dude's argument is "I went on a trip sometime and think I saw a bunch of wolves", that's not even data, and holds zero weight in the discussion.
I like that he tells that story as if it provides credibility and then goes on to denounce wolf experts and site the "hard truth" produced by "actual [but not cited] research".
I have no idea if his apparent conclusions are correct or not but his rhetoric is total nonsense and shouldn't even be considered.
Edit: I don't have a side in this debate, and I don't think redditors are stupid, that's not what I was trying to say. I just saw the word "data" used to refer to a random number some guy said on the internet and took the opportunity act all self righteous and feel like I'm so much more logical than other people. I am the stupid redditor guys.
cocorebop314 karma
I'm surprised these are the highest responses. If the crux of the dude's argument is "I went on a trip sometime and think I saw a bunch of wolves", that's not even data, and holds zero weight in the discussion.
I like that he tells that story as if it provides credibility and then goes on to denounce wolf experts and site the "hard truth" produced by "actual [but not cited] research".
I have no idea if his apparent conclusions are correct or not but his rhetoric is total nonsense and shouldn't even be considered.
Edit: I don't have a side in this debate, and I don't think redditors are stupid, that's not what I was trying to say. I just saw the word "data" used to refer to a random number some guy said on the internet and took the opportunity act all self righteous and feel like I'm so much more logical than other people. I am the stupid redditor guys.
View HistoryShare Link