You guys are doing a great job bringing much needed attention to this and making people like me - 'ex-seaworld goers' open their eyes finally to this travesty.
My question to you was, do you think there is a legitimate legal argument that the likes of Seaworld and Miami Seaqurium are in breach of licensing laws in holding these animals?
As I read the law it says they don't own them, they hold them in trust for the US people for education purposes?
As someone who has been to both Seaworld Orlando and Miami Seaqurium I find it hard to believe that they are held only for educational purposes? The term 'Sea Circus' has been used, which I feel is a more true description - your thoughts?
carlorlando18 karma
Hi John and Samantha,
You guys are doing a great job bringing much needed attention to this and making people like me - 'ex-seaworld goers' open their eyes finally to this travesty.
My question to you was, do you think there is a legitimate legal argument that the likes of Seaworld and Miami Seaqurium are in breach of licensing laws in holding these animals?
As I read the law it says they don't own them, they hold them in trust for the US people for education purposes?
As someone who has been to both Seaworld Orlando and Miami Seaqurium I find it hard to believe that they are held only for educational purposes? The term 'Sea Circus' has been used, which I feel is a more true description - your thoughts?
View HistoryShare Link