bodangren2
Highest Rated Comments
bodangren22 karma
Thanks for the honesty. I was publicly pushing, as well, especially for what I felt was important about QT -- the integrated dev tools, which Ubuntu has never had (Quickly, a little, I guess, but that never went as far as I had hoped).
How active do you think Canonical will be in driving QT library development from now on?
bodangren27 karma
Agreed. I love Simple Scan, especially since when you add an HP network printer, network scan is already set up and doesn't require an extra 300MB of "driver" software.
Here's my questions: On a personal level (not as a rep of Canonical), do you regret that Ubuntu didn't go with QT when they first made Unity (for example, just adopting Unity 2D)? How far behind do you think that writing it as a Compiz extension put you behind?
View HistoryShare Link