anonymousinsomniac

You've spoken of your linguistic disagreements, but what are the philosophical disagreements you have with Chomsky?

So, are you saying you believe that when people talk about intuition or introspection, they're just doing some basic assumption or inference about what something probably means or is, with the addition of some quasi-mystic or spiritual jargon?

Meaning, the "confused terms" are just someone adding an extra degree of "truthfulness" to a process of inference that isn't actually there?