aminok80 karma2014-02-20 20:35:08 UTC
This is one of the best questions here. It could even be narrowed down to why the dragnet method of combating money laundering is used. Subjecting the population to total financial surveillance, by requiring every financial transaction to be reported, to stop money laundering, seems like the type of bargain struck by the East German Stasi, and inconsistent with liberal democracy.
Other methods that might be perhaps less effective, could be used that would result in privacy being compromised much less in comparison.
View HistoryShare Link
aminok10 karma2014-02-20 18:27:43 UTC
Thank you for doing this IAmA, it shows a lot of open-mindedness.
I just really hope Bitcoin exchanges don't face any additional regulations that other money transmitters don't have to deal with. The only proposal I've seen suggested by your office that I find reasonable is that exchanges be required to disclose that Bitcoin transactions are irreversible and that the price of bitcoin is volatile. Simple, easy to comply with, and good for the consumer.
My question is, have you read any of the discussions in /r/bitcoin about the hearings you've been involved in and the talks you've given?
aminok9 karma2019-05-08 19:11:42 UTC
What if you were in a room with Toby, a space telescope, and a Mars Rover, and you could only send two of them into space?
aminok7 karma2014-05-01 19:18:13 UTC
Recovering stolen cash = uncovering private key controlling stolen BTC.
Not the same but similar. It's true that the private key could be encrypted with a passphrase only inside the thief's mind, but people can be held for contempt of court if they don't divulge that information.
aminok5 karma2014-02-20 21:10:37 UTC
You cited one of the legitimate uses of tumblers, which is to keep businesses' financial information private from competitors.
I'll add that tumblers and other innovations that increase privacy are needed to protect people from criminals.
Exposed financial information on the block chain would give criminals a means of tracking and preying on individuals, making P2P digital currency much more dangerous to use.
P2P digital currency must become better at protecting privacy if its full potential is to be realized. A public block chain without privacy features to prevent tracking, while extremely convenient for investigations, is not viable or desirable when all factors are considered.
Copyright © 2014 BestofAMA.com, All rights reserved.
reddit has not approved or endorsed BestofAMA, reddit design elements are trademarks of reddit inc.