afhsdhfkjsdhakfjhwir

What was the most-read story on DallasNews.com last year?

In this digital content news economy, how do you balance a need for clicks/page views with a need for high-quality journalism? Does the subscription model change this? How is an individual journalist at the Morning News judged and evaluted? By the quantity of their clicks or the content of their reporting?

Be real, how much did it suck talking to people who cancelled their subscriptions because the editorial board endorsed Clinton? Has there been any discussion of a disclaimer on every editorial that explains the function of an editorial and its separation from the paper's news reporting?

You worked at 538, right? How did Nate Silver (and everybody else) blow it in 2016?

How do you and the paper navigate the issue of false balance, both in the news department and on the editorial page? (For example, does the DMN really need to give safe harbor to a buffoon like Mark Davis so that it can claim a conservative viewpoint?) There are two sides to every story, sure, but when one side is relying on conspiracy theories and fake news to bolster its case, it seems disingenuous to give both sides equal weight.