I personally find it surprising that in 2012 the best distro model Linux (not just Ubuntu) has come up with is "package every single application you could possibly need along with the OS, then update every single thing all at once every X months." What are your thoughts on the milestone-distro model for the desktop environment? Do you think it needs fixing? If so, are there any plans for Canonical to take the lead? If not, why?
acabal3 karma
One of Ingo Molnar's recent posts highlight an issue that I think is one of the biggest ones facing widespread Linux success: https://plus.google.com/109922199462633401279/posts/VSdDJnscewS
I personally find it surprising that in 2012 the best distro model Linux (not just Ubuntu) has come up with is "package every single application you could possibly need along with the OS, then update every single thing all at once every X months." What are your thoughts on the milestone-distro model for the desktop environment? Do you think it needs fixing? If so, are there any plans for Canonical to take the lead? If not, why?
View HistoryShare Link