a1thirteen

"The only parts up for debate are the specific nuances" - That's not for you to decide. You can't decide with absolute authority that the majority of your documentary is factually accurate, and not open to discussion.

Also, stating that the only potential grey areas in the documentary are due to how it was edited is a terrible defence.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I remember, your documentary states that Jesus did not exist. The theory p ut forward is that Jesus is a mere personification of more abstract ideas such as the calendar and seasons. This is a complete juxtaposition with the leading historical concensus is that Jesus was a real person who existed.

This is just one example I can recall of something in your documentary stating things as though they are probably true and should be believed, rather than fanciful theories which should be treated as such. Blind belief in the sort of things your documentary states is dangerous, and not conductive to healthy societal movement. But again, correct me if I'm mistaken, it's been a while since I watched it.

So glad to see a critical voice of reason amongst this sea of blind believers. When I watched the 2007 Zeitgeist Documentary, I couldn't believe it! I have never seen such a plethora of far-reaching unsubstantiated twaddle in my life. It really gets to me how many people watch this stuff and just go along with it because it's in documentary form.

I've never been able to find any credible sources. Could you please point me towards them? I'll be more than happy to change my opinion in lieu of credible evidence.