TheWolfisGrey53

So the logic is 100% understandable , and the passion you guys have is admirable...BUT I'm going to go out on a limb and assume the undercurrent of this is that we are all 100% equal legally regardless if your a judge, Supreme Court Judge, police, or a sandwich artist.

Our, and I mean the world since time began for organized society, has held that a occupation dictated how your were treated and the rights you have. Ugly if you cannot obtain that station, but a street sweeper being on the same level as the CIA or FBI in the legal sense....does that sound appealing?

Are you guys sure your passion isn't creating ideals that are impractical in the grand scheme, boosted by a loose set of applicable legal doctrine?

Sigh..."No" was a very deep response.

No as in "I disagree!" or was it no as in, "your occupation and role has no bearings on how a person was treated and rights they had." type of no?

And "Equal Justice Under the Law" is 1. An ideology to pursue, as 2. FAIR and EQUAL representation is the goal, and we are imperfect. Not intended to mean we are all equal in terms of our station.

Utopia is idea I love as well. I WANT yall to be right. We should all be equal, and there should be no poverty, no one hungery...

Look, all I'm saying is, yall ideas sound great, but first you have to convince people that there are NO SUCH THING as a special station with privileges, then argue why qualified immunity as a whole applies as a thing that is not useful or necessary at all.

Utopia