ThePortalsOfFrenzy

But seriously, if they were secretive about the use of a surrogate, but the baby is genetically theirs, they can't say they adopted. So what other options to hide the surrogacy could have been used?

It's a good question, though. They wanted to keep the use of a surrogate secret, but have a child who is genetically theirs. So they can't tell people they adopted. What other options for keeping it a secret did they have?

It's not a different level of woo, it's way worse

I'm sorry, are you suggesting that Myers Briggs tests are worse than this methodology "designed" to gather bogus evidence against someone in order to convict them of a crime?

I just want to be sure I'm not misunderstanding what you are saying. And if I am not, I'm curious how you determine that faux personality tests are worse than false convictions and imprisonment.

They're a young guy couple...

I like how your typo still clearly makes your point.

We had a Mormon family at the end of the cul-de-sac we moved to. Once my wife learned this she walked over, knocked on the door, and asked if anyone babysat. Of course, 2 of the 7 kids did. 2 of the others became our kids' best friends. We did some wholesome fun things with them, like camping in their backyard that extended to the creek and woods behind our neighborhood, and fishing in said creek. Game nights too. We never experienced them preaching to us. Good people.