TeenieBopper

You've mentioned in a lot of responses how things justices care about- history, text, originalism, etc-means there's a mountain of evidence that ISLT is wrong. But do you have any evidence that the Supreme Court actually cares about any of those things and instead uses those as a cover to be partisan hacks? And that they wouldn't hesitate to throw those things out the window to continue to be partisan hacks?

That puts any of the justices interested in the ISLT in a tough spot

Does it though? They have lifetime appointments and impeachment is a political tool, not a legal/ethical one. What's stopping five of the six conservative justices from embracing ISLT and saying "lol, because we feel like it?"