Tchaikovsky08

To what extent does the FCC's decision to disregard (1) the quantity of pro net neutrality comments, and (2) the "cyberwar" campaign to flood the site with fake comments affect whether a court will conclude today's vote was arbitrary and capricious?

The "arbitrary and capricious" doctrine sets a high standard of proof necessary to prevail in a civil action.

Are you aware of any steps Google / YouTube is taking to address this problem? Or is it the inevitable result of any algorithm designed to keep people on the site?