Stone_d_

This is a great question. Perhaps I'm not well informed, but I like the direction the world is going but I don't think we're ready for full on crypto any time soon, I think that's for when we hit a resource based economy and when people are all good to each other so nobody does anything bad. Crypto undermines unity at the moment, and I think we need temporary global unity at least until we're on multiple planets. Crypto does break down barriers to trade, borders, tariffs, stuff like that, but it also destroys regulation. I'm not sure you can get the best of both worlds, but that so many are trying is a really great thing.

At what point do people start accepting that at least a marginal segment of the population has nothing to contribute to the workforce? Should that segment be provided for?

What would the writers of the Constitution have done differently with today's technology?

https://www.madinamerica.com/author/lkelmenson/

The above link might be interesting to you, I'd be extremely interested to hear your thoughts on some of the posts by the psychiatrist from the link. Do you have any data to support the notion that prescription drugs have positive long term outcomes for patients experiencing debilitating mental conditions?

Edit: basically, what convinced you that the best way for you to help the mentally ill is through prescription medication?

Satellite imagery can effectively track the location of the world's elephants and protect them from harm, or at least catch the people responsible. Furthermore, satellites can aid conservationalists in leading animals to safe habitats and resources where they can thrive. How would you feel about protecting all animals using satellites, and if data like how many deer were hit by cars was tracked?