SlaughterhouseIce9

But what really got to me was watching a veteran-owned organization publicly go after another organization with a veteran-hiring program. Ignoring the fact that Starbucks never said they were hiring refugees (outside our former translators who managed to get to the US) in the United States, Starbucks was hiring veterans before it was the cool thing to do. It really upset me to watch a group of fellow GWOT vets trash a company that was already doing the thing they claimed they should be doing. Why would any other company ever start a veteran hiring program after that? All they have to do is look at Starbucks’ example: hiring veterans and still getting trashed on FOX News for not being patriotic enough.

Way to violate Article 118 of the UCMJ because you fucking murdered him.

Edit: Thanks for the gold, anon. For anybody else interested in truth and not in Trumper lies, here's an internal piece from Starbucks from October 29, 2014 talking about their veteran hiring goals. Because some Trump supporters will claim that Starbucks only promised to hire 10000 vets this year after moving to hire more refugees, and this is a lie easily demolished by any of the billions of people in the world with access to fucking Google. They met that goal, and in 2017 pledged to hire 15,000 more veterans.

My toddler found Futurama on Netflix, on her own, and loves it. I'm very proud of her, and it's nice to have something I can stand to watch with her. Just thought you should know, there's a brand new generation growing up on Futurama. Has anyone else told you about their kids watching Futurama?

and marking everything up way past MSRP.

Same thing Gander Mountain did/is doing.

Just to piggy back on what /u/0zamatazBuckshank said, hahaha. Alright, have a good long weekend, stay safe, don't drink and drive, and if you do drink and you need a driver, you can call me.

This is not official legal advice and does not form the basis of an attorney-client relationship. I'm not even a lawyer

If you were providing official legal advice and weren't a lawyer, that'd be an Unauthorized Practice of Law charge.

Probably. I'm not a lawyer. This is not official legal advice and does not form the basis of an attorney-client relationship.