RUbernerd

The arrays.

I don't think you actually read his comment.

If you take those two individuals as you say with the stipulations he mentioned, Person 1 would be liable for $500 in taxes, bringing them to $19,500. Person B would be liable for $18,500 in taxes, bringing them to $181,500 taxable income.

Granted, I think it'd be better to do a standard "10% with $5,000 non-taxable standard deduction with potential for outlet", which would put Person 1 at $23,000 take home, whereas Person 2 would be at $185,000. That would help anyone who really needs the help, but fairly taxing everyone.

Well, just because I did it, where do I submit prize to the multi million digit prime number deal?

Yeah, and consider this. WHEN did he speak in favor of network neutrality? Oh, right, just AFTER the point where he found he was going to lose the senate.

Obama talks big. He talks about change, and hope, but when it really comes down to it, he's a load of shit. He's using network neutrality as a political card. He's using spying, SOPA, CISPA, guantanamo bay, and other shit as a political card.

Granted, with the way events are heading, the old definition of superpower-aliance may prevail once again.