Perfect_Fit

And you are doing a WONDERFUL job at it!! We are not taking jabs at you, we are only making them at the System. (I am personally upvoting everything you post. And a HUGE TY for taking the time to report this here) We are only interjecting facts that you should not in your "bringer of pure facts" role that you are presently in.. so for the Read-a-longs please excuse us while we fill in the blanks for them ;)

but that leads to the obvious question "Who is the 'enemy'?" Is it the American people, since that is who Bradly wanted to get this information to!

Does that mean our military considers the American people the "Enemy"?

And you just proved you dont have a clue who the evidence he gave to wikileaks proves are the guilty party... he would have been properly executed, and no one would know his name, or that he even existed... it would have been an "accident" or an unexpected attack" depending on if they wanted his casket to stand on to rally public hatred, or if they wanted him to just disappear.

Trust me the "proper channels" are there to make sure witness' never tell anything ever again... you'd be a complete moron if you thought otherwise!

but your quoted section is the same way

... are you delusional? I never quoted anything, I submitted a link to the record of the chat... and I see you grabbed your quotes from the mainstream media (only quote these sections) script, instead of actually reading it yourself... shortcutting knowledge only cheats yourself... and ONLY gets you a good grade in the public educational system... doesnt mean you actually understand it!

Oh its relevant... but you dont understand enough to see the connections... keep learning.

Fire being released to humanity has been used for arson... so whoever gave mankind fire is "aiding the enemy"? Or the guy who invented the hammer, as they have been used by many to cause murder... the fact is Manning gave the info to a source who would give it to humanity after editing for innocent peoples safety, as the American Congress had already commended Wikileaks for that ability a few months before Manning handed them over. (Where Wikileaks instantaneously (if you believe in coincidences) became a "terrorist organization" (which is complete bullshit))

And I pointed out, as the OP well understands, Manning couldnt hand over the evidence to the criminals (since if you actually knew what was in those documents you'd know) because the evidence showed that there was a sinister corruption in the highest levels of American government and their international affairs... but sure you'd rather discuss the relevance of apples and oranges next! To ignore the intentions of this brave man to expose the world leaders crimes... sure they are talking about it all today in the Bilderburg meeting. (And yes even that is relevant if you understand well enough!

:) ok fine... do you want to actually review information? Do you agree that his Oath is to America and the Constitution, and not to protect corruption inside the government? If you can agree to rational logical aspects like that then we may actually be able to have a discussion, and I will admit I may have jumped the gun in my reaction to your arguments... or are you going to INSIST the "military protocol is more important then Justice for all, and the preservation of America's values? In that case I'd ask how much are you being paid to watch America burn?