Nillix

Makes sense, really. Discharging $10,000 of debt carries the same penalties as discharging 20k. Or 30k. There have to be controls in place to prevent abuse.

Yes, but pawn is a higher risk business than your typical secured loan through a bank.

Thank you for doing this AMA. As a police officer, constitutional law is near and dear to my heart (cue the hivemind bashing). My question is how do you see the fourth amendment evolving over the next twenty to thirty years in the weighing of personal freedom against our ability to apprehend criminals and do our jobs?

It seems like the interpretation of the constitution over the last ten years has been in the government's favor (warrant-less searches of cell phones incidental to arrest, warrant-less phone taps, "reasonable belief" doctrine, etc.). Do you see a swing going in the opposite direction in the future? Or the government becoming more restrictive and erring on the side of private citizens?

Also, how do you see the evolution of the fourth amendment over the past ten years?

Edit I'll always do my job under the restrictions I'm given. Just wondering, as a professional, both your opinions on the restrictions (or lack therof) and where you see the future of said restrictions.

Did they inform them when the new breach happened?

Thanks for taking the time to answer! Lots in here to pour over and think about.